Category: (Book)
14 new, starting at $15.84
23 used, starting at $7.76
Through a nationwide telephone survey of 2,000 people and an
additional 200 face-to-face interviews, Michael O. Emerson and
Christian Smith probed the grassroots of white evangelical America.
They found that despite recent efforts by the movement's leaders to
address the problem of racial discrimination, evangelicals
themselves seem to be preserving America's racial chasm. In fact,
most white evangelicals see no systematic discrimination against
blacks. But the authors contend that it is not active racism that
prevents evangelicals from recognizing ongoing problems in American
society. Instead, it is the evangelical movement's emphasis on
individualism, free will, and personal relationships that makes
invisible the pervasive injustice that perpetuates racial
inequality. Most racial problems, the subjects told the authors,
can be solved by the repentance and conversion of the sinful
individuals at fault.
Combining a substantial body of evidence with sophisticated
analysis and interpretation, the authors throw sharp light on the
oldest American dilemma. In the end, they conclude that despite the
best intentions of evangelical leaders and some positive trends,
real racial reconciliation remains far over the horizon.
Divided by Faith by Michael O. Emerson and Christian Smith has an ingenious, troubling argument. "[E]vangelicals desire to end racial division and inequality, and attempt to think and act accordingly. But, in the process, they likely do more to perpetuate the racial divide than they do to tear it down." Emerson and Smith, who conducted 2,000 telephone surveys and 200 face-to-face interviews in preparing this book, argue that evangelicals have a theological world view that makes it difficult for them to perceive systematic injustices in society. In particular, evangelical emphasis of individualism and free will seem to predispose them to believe that most racial problems can be solved if individuals will only repent of their sins. Therefore, many well-meaning strategies for healing racial divisions (such as cross-cultural friendships) carry within them the seeds of their own defeat. Divided by Faith also includes a brilliant, concise history of evangelical thought about race from colonial times to the civil rights movement. Clearly written and impeccably researched, this book ranks among the most compassionate and critical studies of contemporary evangelicalism. --Michael Joseph Gross
What You Never KnewReviewed by Sam Miller, 2007-09-16
This book gets you out of your own hide and context and helps you better understand your context as opposed to the context of others from another type of family, neighborhood, race. We in america have a terrible bias that makes us think of ourselves as the best in the world. We base that mostly on material possessions and military power, not on any real attempt to identify with those in other parts of the world. The same is true of the white culture of this country who do not realize - and cannot without a lot of hard work and introspection - what it is like to be non-white and to grow up in a non-white family, neighborhood, and deal with whites and the predominant white culture. There are multiple white contexts just as there are multiple black and multiple Hispanic contexts - looking at them and seeing the bias helps towards understanding one another and working together. We have a lot to learn about God and Jesus that we can simply learn from breaking down walls and talking.
Powerful, Yet at Times Missing the Ultimate Power SourceReviewed by Robert W. Kellemen, 2007-07-31
Please, don't read this book without reading the "sequel": United
by Faith.
"Divided by Faith" probes the problem, as understood through a
dissertation research project, of race relations in Evangelicalism
in America in the 1990s. The results are troubling and at times
produce hopelessness. However, facts are facts, and this sort of
detailed quantitative and qualitative study is all-too-rare in
Evangelical circles.
Emerson's premise is that much of what white Evangelicals do to
unite across racial lines end up being counter-productive. He does
so by showing a concise history of Evangelical thought about racism
from Colonial times to the Civil Rights movement. His basic premise
is that most work done is too individualistic--one person trying
alone to cross racial boundaries. His basic suggestion is the
cross-cultural congregation. Unfortunately, until one reads "United
by Faith," how to accomplish this goal is left to the reader's
imagination--which may by now have been stunted by all the piles of
statistics suggesting that Evangelical racial reconciliation is
futile.
The power of God, starting with one person's commitment to
cross-cultural relationships, can start a chain reaction--and lead
to hope.
Reviewer: Bob Kellemen, Ph.D., is the author of Beyond the
Suffering: Embracing the Legacy of African American Soul Care and
Spiritual Direction , Soul Physicians, Spiritual Friends.
Intolerant of Policy DisagreementReviewed by John McAdams, 2007-04-17
What we have here is a leftist author who believes the way to fix
all racial problems is for everybody to accept his policy
prescriptions.
He thinks white conservative Christians, although showing little
racial animus toward blacks, are "part of the problem" because they
don't accept his particular political views. This bias taints any
insightful parts of the book.
Some good, some bad in this bookReviewed by Greg Brady, 2006-07-22
First off, I am a white evangelical in a moderately sized city to
give you some idea of the perspective I bring to reading
this.
THE GOOD:
The statistics in the book (the median net worth of blacks is
$3,700 compared to $43,800 for whites, P.13...the subtle racism in
depiction of the 'evils' of heavy metal music which is usually
consumed by Caucasians and rap music which is more favored by urban
blacks, p.15...the 1998 National Congregations Study showing 90% of
U.S. congregations are formed at least 90% by one race, P.136)
reveal that the Church has a long way to go to demonstrate that
"Red and yellow, black and white they are precious in His
sight".
The personal anecdotes of average evangelical laypeople, both black
and white, help put a human face on the views of those on each side
of 'the divide'. It helps to remind us that the answers may not lie
in 'one size fits all' political solutions.
Chapter 7, as another reviewer mentioned, does a good job of
explaining why it is difficult to maintain a mixed-race
congregation. "Birds of a feather flock together" and over time,
congregations tend to bleed toward one hue or another even despite
the pastor's attempts and the founding members best intentions.
(The story of 'First Church' 147-150 is illustrative) Also, the
tendency of churches to 'market' themselves toward specific groups
cause this too...most churches that feature hymns do not also
feature contemporary rock-tinged praise and worship music..those
who feature 'black' gospel chorals don't tend to feature country
infused "Southern gospel".
THE BAD:
The book seems to be very dismissive towards free will
determination and individual effort, even as it states these are
evangelicals' bedrock values. Since the authors themselves are
evangelicals, it seems self-flagellating that they more or less
paint two crucial elements of the evangelical belief system as
endemic to preventing racial harmony.
It also does seem to embrace a government oriented method of
"fixing things": i.e. whites and blacks would get along better if
they rubbed shoulders as neighbors, therefore laws must
artificially mandate that this happen. The problem with this is the
authors seem to not try and understand WHY the inner city areas,
which tend to have a higher percentage of black population, don't
have as much racial diversity as they would like to see. Is it all
simply "white flight"...or is it possible that people desiring the
best they can manage for their families choose not to live in
neighborhoods they perceive as crime-ridden and unsafe? The same
reason why middle and upper income blacks would choose to leave the
same areas...they're doing the best they can to provide safe haven
for their children as that's what good parents do (or at least try
to do).
The argument can be posited I suppose that what Jesus would do is
to go where the 'trouble' is and I can see the wisdom in that
perspective, but I'm more willing to take more risks with my own
PERSONAL safety in the attempt to minister to others than I am
willing to do with my FAMILY'S safety. My wife and child are more
vulnerable to criminals and because of that I do my best (nothing's
100 percent mind you..even in our 'better' neighborhood we've seen
break-ins) to minimize danger and try to make them feel
sheltered.
I second the comments another reviewer made in that the problem
seems to be 'fixable' in the authors' view primarily through human
efforts. Little to no mention is made of individual believers, both
black and white (and other races for that matter), who strongly
desire to see Christian racial unity as the beginning of the larger
healing of the country by actively PRAYING for it on a repeated
basis. For an evangelical, the belief that God ANSWERS prayer is
foundational and should be a cornerstone of any push to bind
society's wounds.
BOTTOM LINE:
Asks a lot of the right questions and for that it's worth reading.
Just don't expect to find the answers for the "race problem" here.
Petty Politics Disguised as Social ScienceReviewed by Troy McClure, 2006-02-10
I had high hopes for this book, as I was expecting an analysis of
why church congregations are one of the most segregated places in
America. Except for one chapter (more on this chapter below), that
is not at all what the book is about.
Unfortunately, the bulk of the book plays out into a typical
conservative/liberal disagreement. Much of the disagreement between
conservatives and liberals stems from two very different views on
how the world works. Conservatives generally view the world on an
individualist basis, and they count the bulk of life's happenings
to be the result of cause and effect from the individuals actions.
Liberals generally see the world with a more corporate view; they
tend to claim institutions as the causes of problems, and
collective responses as the remedy.
The main conclusion of the authors from their interviews with
Evangelical Christians is that they claim to want racial equality,
and in fact the bulk of them sincerely desire racial harmony in the
world and act accordingly in their own lives, but the vast majority
of Evangelical Christians are doing nothing to change *the system*.
Per the authors, the main cause of racism today is institutional
racism - e.g. a stacked legal system, unfair lending practices,
unequal salaries, etc. The fact that Evangelicals are not standing
up against this is inexcusable to the authors.
The statistical proof for this institutional racism is laid out in
chapter one, which brings me to my main criticism. The authors' use
of statistics to back up their claims is both sloppy and
irresponsible. The issue of race in America is important and filled
with emotion; proclaiming loud condemnation based on very poor
statistical analysis does not help. I am a professional
statistician by trade, and if I was to draw definitive conclusions
from the stats that the authors quote, I would be out of a job
quickly. If institutional racism does exist, then Christians
absolutely should be fighting against it. But I am unconvinced by
the given statistics.
But at this point it degenerates into politics. These statistics
have been lobbied and attacked by liberals and conservatives for
years. This book argues nothing new. Its point: there is a lot of
division in America, and if conservatives would adopt the world
view of liberals we would all get along.
Chapter 7, however, is the wheat among the chaff. Chapter 7 is an
insightful view on race and religion and why congregations are so
segregated. The chapter is a bit more theoretical, but the analysis
is thoughtful and the conclusion challenging. If possible, I would
recommend that people read only Chapter 7 and ditch the rest,
unless of course you are in the mood for some typical political
bickering.